Search for: "US v. Pina"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
And for that reason, they want to use me instead of him. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:39 am
The IPKat's friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Abogados), who coincidentally represented YouTube in the Spanish litigation, has kindly sent him a non-official English translation of the decision, which you can read here. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:54 am
Pina, 453 Mass. 438 (2009): Court in Pina held that an affidavit did not establish probable cause to search the defendant's home. [read post]
1 May 2011, 11:12 am
Pina and Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:22 pm
Pina, 2008 Mass. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:25 pm
Pina, 453 Mass. 438 (2009). [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:07 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 11, 2009 Pina v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:18 am
First the good: State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:15 am
Pina, 453 Mass. 438, 441 (2009). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:12 am
The case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:12 am
The case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
, 33 NY2d 463, 466; Giunta’s Meat Farms, Inc. v Pina Constr. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
Bienvenido Pina, Defendant-Appellant.2008 WL 1822792(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:14 am
Pina, 406 Mass. 540, 544, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 832 (1990); Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
”).NAXOS Rights US INC. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 10:01 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
